![]() Therefore, the approaches of both theorists assign stress an important position in human self-development, spiritual growth, and healing. For Frankl, the approach of tragic optimism also involved the perception of suffering as a meaningful experience, a life lesson that promised happiness once learned well. Kűbler-Ross approached grieving as a path to full acceptance and peace of mind, suggesting that there can be no true harmony without suffering. ![]() A major similarity in these two psychiatrists’ positions is the perception of stress as a form of mourning about life’s misfortunes and a certain adaptive process for overcoming that stress to survive. Frankl called it logotherapy – a form of existential analysis targeting the search for life meaning (Seaward, 2020).Īs one can see, both Kűbler-Ross and Frankl focus on human stress as a form of suffering in the face of insurmountable life troubles, such as death or suffering. Instead, he advocated digging deeper into it to find meaning and grow spiritually. Thus, by assigning a vital meaning in the human emotional life to it, Frankl proposed not to get rid of stress and suffering. In his opinion, suffering is an integral part of every person’s life, and human pain and misery have an in-depth meaning and purpose. ![]() A survivor of the Nazi concentration camp Auschwitz, Frankl dedicated his life to the study of human suffering and meaning-making in that process. The position of Viktor Frankl on stress and its connection to the human mind and body is different. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |